However, Wente proposes the
existence of various numbers of social assistance programs already present
within the city of Toronto. These
programs include free summer camp, programs to find jobs for young adults with
criminal records, and funding the less fortunate for community college (Wente,
2012). Among greater city “priority”
areas, the Canadian government had already invested over 120 million dollars to
improve social assistance programs, most apparently within Toronto (Wente,
2012). As a Neoconservatist, Wente suggests
the majority of government funded social assistance programs within these areas
are not beneficial towards the population because many Canadians within greater
city regions continue to live among poverty, and violent, crime infested areas
(Wente, 2012). Wente proposes that the
government has refused to take time to investigate the effects such social
assistance programs have provided for these issues. Because of the lack of such basic statistics,
Wente believes it almost impossible to understand whether these social programs
that spend billions of dollars to help the poor and susceptible indeed provide
beneficial to such communities or not (Wente, 2012). Wente’s ideas drift towards a neoconservative
ideological view. This is because such
ideology calls for the dismantling of the social welfare state, as Wente wants
to reduce the amount of social assistance programs available that aid the
public by investigating and terminating those that don’t seem beneficial or
useful to troubled communities (Wente, 2012).
Being of the Liberal party, Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty
applies a liberal ideological analysis towards the recent outbreak of gun
violence (Howlet & Mills, 2012).
Although Toronto’s Mayor Rob Ford pushes to hire more police officers to
patrol the area, McGuinty criticizes Ford for voicing his refusal for the
development of more youth related social programs (Howlett & Mills, 2012). He also proposed sending police into higher
priority areas to make arrests and seize guns (Howlett & Mills, 2012). Ford’s ideas illustrate a neo-conservative
analysis with emphasis on importance of strict punishment (Hicks, 2004). Neoconservatives also carry the belief that
the political government may need to resort to authoritarian rule to protect the
political order (Hicks, 2004). Ford
believes it unnecessary to provide more social programs, as he does not believe
“hug-a-thug” programs would prevent the reoccurrence of gun violence (Howlett
& Mills, 2012). This again provides
us a key component of the neoconservative ideology. Such ideology believes the existence of
social programs should cease, as it rejects all Liberal efforts to make
equality of opportunity a reality (Drury, 1997). However, McGuinty’s statement reflects the efforts
of liberal ideology. Although such
ideology blames the unfortunate, it believes the importance to reform social
programs in order to balance severe cases of need (Bracken, 2004). McGuinty also noted that all three levels of
the government, police and those working with young people must work together
to solve the problem (Howlett & Mills, 2012). This again distributes ideas from the liberal
ideology because it believes that power is shared between private individuals,
pressure groups and the state (Bracken, 2004).
All three groups working together would ensure that no group rose high
enough to dominate (Bracken, 2004).
From a Neo-conservatist view, it is evident the belief that
government structures are not equipped in investigating a more beneficial
approach to social assistance spending, as they believe the welfare state unnecessary
(Drury, 1997). This becomes palpable when
identifying the underlying ideologies behind the similar ideas of Margaret
Wente and Toronto’s mayor, Rob Ford. “We’ve
organized ourselves in such a way that mostly we have no idea what we’re doing,”
says an inside representative of the Canadian House of Commons (Howlett &
Mills, 2012). However, a cut to any
program may provide a negative reaction amongst the disadvantaged population of
Canada (Wente, 2012). We cannot expect a
Neo-conservatist government to spend time and funding studying the impacts of
social welfare programs within Canada, when such type of government offers no
interest in doing so. Perhaps our
government structure might want to look towards a more liberal, or social
democratic ideological view. As stated
before, although the liberal ideology blames the unfortunate, it also tends to
support the importance of social welfare within the system (Bracken,
2004). Our government should actively
work towards promoting realistic solutions to persistent social problems. But for now, our country still suffers.
- Kara
References:
Wente, M. (2012, October 13). “The awful truth about social programs.” The
Globe and Mail. Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/margaret-wente-the-awful-truth-about-social-programs/article4610262/.
Howlett, K. & Mills, C. (2012, July 20). “McGuinty calls for cops and social programs
in wake of shootings.” The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/toronto/mcguinty-calls-for-cops-and-social-programs-in-wake-of-shootings/article4432066/.
Drury, S. (1997, May 17). “Demise of the Tory Tradition: Conservatives have forgotten their debt to
the poor.” University of Regina, Faculty of the Arts. Retrieved from http://phil.uregina.ca/CRC/herald_demise.html.
Bracken, D. (2004).
“Elements of Ideology Liberalism.”
Social Welfare Policy Analysis. Retrieved from http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~bracken/lib.html.
I really enjoyed reading your blog. It was very informative and I totally agree.
ReplyDeleteOur government is slowly cutting funding to the social assistance programs with the belief that these cuts will more or less force, not encourage welfare recipients to find other solutions to make their lives better.
But without social programs to help them make proper choices and decisions about their lives, they will ultimately fall through the cracks of society. They will have no choice but the resort to crime and violence in order to survive their harsh living conditions.
We need to keep advocating to stop these cuts for the less fortunate. I also believe the government should be more knowledgable about the social programs they deliver and the effects the cuts have on recipients.
Jen.M