Friday, October 19, 2012

Poverty in Feudalistic Europe and how it affected Child Welfare

               Poverty is an enormous social issue today that’s growing at an alarming rate, and was even a huge problem formerly in the 11th century. I believe personally that we are not doing everything that we can to prevent and help the people in poverty and people who don’t have enough to afford proper nutrition. It would cost roughly $175 billion dollars to end world poverty (Harack, 2011) and considering that there are roughly 271.6 million Americans not living in poverty and Americans spent about $646 on Christmas gifts in 2011 (American Research Group, 2011), there would be over $175 billion and we would be able to end world poverty alone with just America’s holiday shopping money. But why don’t we? I believe it’s because poverty is out of sight, out of mind, and we believe that the problem will fix itself eventually. We also like to spoil ourselves, and in general, wouldn’t give up $646 to charity out of selfishness. However, poverty in feudalistic Europe is seen much differently than today in terms of the kind of poverty, as the type of work and pay was significantly diverse.


                Women living in 12th century Europe were not always able to take care of their children, and as a consequence, these children were living in poverty and welfare for the rest of their lives. Instead of infanticide, the church accepted the anonymity of abandonment of their children in which they would be raised by nurses until the age of four, when they would move to a hospice where they could earn a living at age seven (Fuchs, 1984). These children would grow up to become nurses as well, or move out of the hospice to pursue jobs offered by nobles as a serf.

                For those children that were not abandoned and lived with their parents, it was often in poor living conditions with very little to sustain themselves. Many of these populaces were working with their numerous children trying to make ends meet to be able to pay the landlord’s rent, but harvest failures and bad weather could be a deciding factor on whether the children continued to live in welfare (Hatcher, 1994). As the Black Death made its way into Europe in 1350, the amount of poverty in Europe did not decline, but the amount of serfs available to work the field did. This lead to peasant revolts, kings taking back their land, and the establishment of a centralized government.

As the decline of feudalism took its course, it was interconnected to other social issues that arose among the Europeans. Poverty, crime, illness, and social disorder were products of the switch from feudalism to industrialism near the 17th century (Penna, 2005). The social welfare of children was directly affected by this switch, as this brought about the English Poor Laws and the employment of children for cheap labour, which will be discussed in future blog posts.

References:

American Research Group, Inc. (2011). 2011 Christmas Gift Spending Plans Flat. Retrieved October 16, 2012, from the American Research Group Inc.’s website: http://americanresearchgroup.com/holiday/


Fuchs, R. (1984). Abandoned Children: Foundlings and Child Welfare in Nineteenth-Century France. Albany (NY): State University of New York Press.

Harack, B. (2011). How much would it cost to end extreme poverty in the world? Retrieved October 16, 2012, from the Vision of Earth website: http://www.visionofearth.org/economics/ending-poverty/how-much-would-it-cost-to-end-extreme-poverty-in-the-world/

Hatcher, J. (1994). England in the Aftermath of the Black Death. Past and Present, 144, 3-35.

Penna, S. (2011). The Children Act 2004: Child Protection and Social Surveillance. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 27(2), 143-157.

 By: Spencer Edgar

4 comments:

  1. Its really mind blowing that if Americans took their holiday shopping money that we could end world poverty. It just goes to show how selfish people are, and how our world works. I agree with your post, that the world does not pay enough attention to poverty and child welfare. I think that this is something that everybody should be aware of, because it is was a huge issue in feudalistic Europe, and it is still a huge issue today, even here in Canada. I enjoyed your post and thanks for sharing.

    -Lyndsay

    ReplyDelete
  2. I still can't come to terms with the fact that world poverty can be ended in such a short amount of time, and with what I consider to be little effort from everyone. When I think about how much money we spend in a month on food that goes to waste, clothing and other products we don't need, it is disappointing that none of that goes to a more worthwhile cause. If indeed it takes only all of America's Christmas shopping money to end world poverty, imagine what a small contribution would be required if the whole populace was involved in ending poverty on a global level.

    I also enjoyed the way you explored poverty in feudalistic Europe. In retrospect, it is true that poverty existed far before the move to globalization and modernism; we tend to forget this. However, matters appear only to worsen as time goes on. As you said, back in time, children were taken on by the Church or employed. The living conditions weren't fantastic, but I'd say incomparable to what it is today. Nowadays, some very unfortunate children live on the streets until the government sees fit to help them.

    ~Valerie

    ReplyDelete
  3. Spencer,

    All I can say is wow. These statistics are upsetting, but I can also see how they are true. With the amount of money that the Canadian government generates, and the rough cost estimated that it would be to end poverty, our country’s poverty could cease in a few years. It amazes me how few people wish to do nothing and sit back and enjoy their consumer goods while others suffer. I’m sure anyone has heard the saying “that could feed a child in Africa for over a week” when little amounts of food are thrown out. This alone shows the amount of resources that go to waste, those that could be put toward use for people who are less fortunate. It is not only those in third-world countries, who are less fortunate, it is Canadians themselves as well.

    I have read your analyzing of early European society and the fact that there were programs handy for those who couldn’t afford to take care of their children. Although it is sad that parents are were not able to take care of their children and had to hand them to the church, it is still good that they were able to be taken care of without the worry of hunger and starvation. Child labour is not enforced today and it is an important issue that has been modernly removed. It is extremely sad that there continues to be parents unable to provide financially for their children. It is sadder to see families broken up over the issue of poverty as well. I believe that the government needs to step in and provide more social assistance for those families who have become devastated by the uncontrollable issue of poverty. The government can provide to make this issue known and work to provide for programs to help these families stay together without fear.

    - Kara

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hello Spencer,

    I like how you post covered this issue. I have gained more knowledge of the topic. You gave many examples or kinds of people living in poverty and that helped me to have a better understanding of the cause.

    I totally agree with you on the fact that we tend to put or give some fancy words into some things in order to feel better about ourselves. For instance, as you mentioned, people spend tremendous amount of money for what? Gifts and decorations? I am not saying that there it is wrong to do so. I am just saying that enough is enough. There's no need for spending a fortune on something that is going to fade away. And by next year, people will probably not use it anymore. So, at some extent people may become addict to this sort of activity or at least it will become a part of who they are and what they do yearly.

    Just like you, I think that we need to re-consider our lifestyle, our spending and our stand towards poverty. Like what Valerie said, a simple action like paying more attention to what we keep and throw will create a difference.

    I like how you have brought new things to the table. For instance, you have mentioned that poverty is there and that we see it, but we do not actually see it. You have also mentioned selfishness and how it plays a role in poverty that we should not underestimate.

    -Farah


    ReplyDelete