Women
living in 12th century Europe were not always able to take care of
their children, and as a consequence, these children were living in poverty and
welfare for the rest of their lives. Instead of infanticide, the church accepted
the anonymity of abandonment of their children in which they would be raised by
nurses until the age of four, when they would move to a hospice where they
could earn a living at age seven (Fuchs, 1984). These children would grow up to
become nurses as well, or move out of the hospice to pursue jobs offered by
nobles as a serf.
For
those children that were not abandoned and lived with their parents, it was
often in poor living conditions with very little to sustain themselves. Many of
these populaces were working with their numerous children trying to make ends
meet to be able to pay the landlord’s rent, but harvest failures and bad weather
could be a deciding factor on whether the children continued to live in welfare
(Hatcher, 1994). As the Black Death made its way into Europe in 1350, the
amount of poverty in Europe did not decline, but the amount of serfs available to
work the field did. This lead to peasant revolts, kings taking back their land,
and the establishment of a centralized government.
As the decline of feudalism
took its course, it was interconnected to other social issues that arose among
the Europeans. Poverty, crime, illness, and social disorder were products of
the switch from feudalism to industrialism near the 17th century (Penna,
2005). The social welfare of children was directly affected by this switch, as
this brought about the English Poor Laws and the employment of children for
cheap labour, which will be discussed in future blog posts.
References:
American
Research Group, Inc. (2011). 2011 Christmas Gift Spending Plans Flat. Retrieved
October 16, 2012, from the American Research Group Inc.’s website: http://americanresearchgroup.com/holiday/
Fuchs, R.
(1984). Abandoned Children: Foundlings
and Child Welfare in Nineteenth-Century France. Albany (NY): State
University of New York Press.
Harack, B.
(2011). How much would it cost to end extreme poverty in the world? Retrieved
October 16, 2012, from the Vision of Earth website: http://www.visionofearth.org/economics/ending-poverty/how-much-would-it-cost-to-end-extreme-poverty-in-the-world/
Hatcher, J. (1994). England in the Aftermath of the Black
Death. Past and Present, 144, 3-35.
Penna, S.
(2011). The Children Act 2004: Child Protection and Social Surveillance. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 27(2),
143-157.
By: Spencer Edgar
Its really mind blowing that if Americans took their holiday shopping money that we could end world poverty. It just goes to show how selfish people are, and how our world works. I agree with your post, that the world does not pay enough attention to poverty and child welfare. I think that this is something that everybody should be aware of, because it is was a huge issue in feudalistic Europe, and it is still a huge issue today, even here in Canada. I enjoyed your post and thanks for sharing.
ReplyDelete-Lyndsay
I still can't come to terms with the fact that world poverty can be ended in such a short amount of time, and with what I consider to be little effort from everyone. When I think about how much money we spend in a month on food that goes to waste, clothing and other products we don't need, it is disappointing that none of that goes to a more worthwhile cause. If indeed it takes only all of America's Christmas shopping money to end world poverty, imagine what a small contribution would be required if the whole populace was involved in ending poverty on a global level.
ReplyDeleteI also enjoyed the way you explored poverty in feudalistic Europe. In retrospect, it is true that poverty existed far before the move to globalization and modernism; we tend to forget this. However, matters appear only to worsen as time goes on. As you said, back in time, children were taken on by the Church or employed. The living conditions weren't fantastic, but I'd say incomparable to what it is today. Nowadays, some very unfortunate children live on the streets until the government sees fit to help them.
~Valerie
Spencer,
ReplyDeleteAll I can say is wow. These statistics are upsetting, but I can also see how they are true. With the amount of money that the Canadian government generates, and the rough cost estimated that it would be to end poverty, our country’s poverty could cease in a few years. It amazes me how few people wish to do nothing and sit back and enjoy their consumer goods while others suffer. I’m sure anyone has heard the saying “that could feed a child in Africa for over a week” when little amounts of food are thrown out. This alone shows the amount of resources that go to waste, those that could be put toward use for people who are less fortunate. It is not only those in third-world countries, who are less fortunate, it is Canadians themselves as well.
I have read your analyzing of early European society and the fact that there were programs handy for those who couldn’t afford to take care of their children. Although it is sad that parents are were not able to take care of their children and had to hand them to the church, it is still good that they were able to be taken care of without the worry of hunger and starvation. Child labour is not enforced today and it is an important issue that has been modernly removed. It is extremely sad that there continues to be parents unable to provide financially for their children. It is sadder to see families broken up over the issue of poverty as well. I believe that the government needs to step in and provide more social assistance for those families who have become devastated by the uncontrollable issue of poverty. The government can provide to make this issue known and work to provide for programs to help these families stay together without fear.
- Kara
Hello Spencer,
ReplyDeleteI like how you post covered this issue. I have gained more knowledge of the topic. You gave many examples or kinds of people living in poverty and that helped me to have a better understanding of the cause.
I totally agree with you on the fact that we tend to put or give some fancy words into some things in order to feel better about ourselves. For instance, as you mentioned, people spend tremendous amount of money for what? Gifts and decorations? I am not saying that there it is wrong to do so. I am just saying that enough is enough. There's no need for spending a fortune on something that is going to fade away. And by next year, people will probably not use it anymore. So, at some extent people may become addict to this sort of activity or at least it will become a part of who they are and what they do yearly.
Just like you, I think that we need to re-consider our lifestyle, our spending and our stand towards poverty. Like what Valerie said, a simple action like paying more attention to what we keep and throw will create a difference.
I like how you have brought new things to the table. For instance, you have mentioned that poverty is there and that we see it, but we do not actually see it. You have also mentioned selfishness and how it plays a role in poverty that we should not underestimate.
-Farah